How we know what we publish

Methodology

One rule sits under everything here: a claim runs only if it can be traced to a primary NAIC or state document. Rather than assert that, we will show it, on one real sentence.

How one sentence gets made

  1. 1

    The trigger

    A guide needs a number

    A guide on the NAIC Model Bulletin has to state how many states have adopted it. That number is a factual claim, so it has to clear the bar before it runs.

  2. 2

    The source

    Straight to the primary document

    We open the NAIC's own adoption map. Not a law firm alert that repeats the count, not a trade-press summary. The regulator's document, or nothing.

    Source NAIC Model Bulletin adoption map (PDF) →
  3. 3

    The check

    Count it, and record when

    We read the current count off the map and write down the date we checked it, because adoption changes through the year and a number without a date is half a fact.

    Checked Oct 2026 · 27 + DC

  4. 4

    The output

    It runs with a source line

    The number publishes with a source line naming the document and its date, so it can never travel without its provenance. On the page, that reads: “As of October 2026, 27 states and DC have adopted the NAIC AI Model Bulletin.”

  5. 5

    The upkeep

    When the map moves, the guide moves

    Adoption is a moving target. When the NAIC updates the map, we revise the guide and its "Last updated" date moves with it, so the date on the page is the date the fact was true.

  6. 6

    The floor

    No source, no sentence

    A claim that cannot be traced to a primary document this way does not run. It gets cut in editing, not softened into a hedge. That is the whole method.

The same rule, every source

We scan the same pipeline every week, ranked by authority. Only the primary tier can ever be the basis for a factual claim.

Primary · the basis for every claim

NAIC materials

The AI topic page, the official adoption map, and Big Data & AI Working Group records. When we cite what the NAIC has done, it comes from here.

State regulators

Department of insurance bulletins across all 50 states and DC, watched weekly in the most active jurisdictions: Colorado, New York, California, and Texas among them.

Secondary · leads and context only

Law firm trackers

Read to catch developments early. We go to the primary document before we write anything down.

Trade press and research

Market context around the rules, never the rules themselves.

Staying current

The state tracker

The state tracker builds on the NAIC's adoption map and adds the layer it leaves out: the adopting instrument, its date, and a link to each state's own primary source. Status buckets are re-checked weekly against the NAIC map; instrument details are verified row by row against that state's own publication. One review date covers the whole table rather than each row, and the tracker's change log records every review, including the ones that found nothing had changed.

For the states that wrote their own rules, we go further and read the two texts against each other. Every difference on those pages carries the evidence on both sides, with a section reference, so you can see the model bulletin's words and the state's words together rather than take our summary for it. Where one instrument says nothing on a point, we print the reading that established the absence (the term searched, the number of hits, and the tool used), because an absence is a finding and has to be checkable too. A page that has not been read at that depth says so; it never shows a blank that could be mistaken for "no difference".

The vendor directory

The vendor directory lists AI vendors that sell into insurance operations and the governance tools insurers use to oversee AI. Inclusion requires a public product description we can cite and sources for the current brand and any ownership relationship we report. A listing is not a recommendation. Inclusion cannot be bought; payment does not determine inclusion, capability conclusions or evidence labels.

Each entry records the current brand, sourced former names, any confirmed owner and acquisition date, a description drawn from the vendor's materials, working classifications, and the date those basics were checked. Ownership is recorded at the brand level, meaning an acquisition that changes who sells a product and answers for it. A financial sponsor holding the company, such as a private equity owner, is outside the scope of this record even where it is public. Where an entry records no ownership relationship, we have not researched one; that is a gap in the record, not a finding, and it does not establish independent ownership. Two dates appear: each entry carries the date that entry was last checked, and the directory carries the date of the last full re-check of every entry. An entry's date moves only when that entry is re-checked. These dates describe a check of basic information, not verification of product capabilities.

Capability assessments are not yet published. When added, they will refer to a specific product and capability and separate the conclusion from the evidence behind it. An unresearched capability will have no assessment; an absent assessment is not a finding.

Capability conclusions

Supported:
The cited source supports the stated capability within the recorded scope, with a check date. This is not a certification.
Not supported:
A cited source explicitly supports a negative finding, with a check date. Missing public information alone does not justify this conclusion.
Unknown:
The available information does not establish whether the product supports the capability.
Not applicable:
The capability does not apply to the product's recorded scope; the assessment must explain why.

Evidence behind a conclusion

Public material:
A linked document or other publicly inspectable material relevant to the capability, with an explanation of what it shows and what it does not establish.
Vendor statement:
A claim made by the supplier, with its source and statement date. The claim alone is not independent verification.
Searched, not found:
The relevant material was not found within a recorded search scope and date. This does not mean the capability or private documentation does not exist.

These evidence labels distinguish inspectable material from a supplier's statement and from an unsuccessful search. They are not vendor scores. Each assessment must retain its sources, scope and check date; a not-applicable conclusion requires a reason even when no evidence label applies.

The roster is re-checked monthly. Once capability profiles are published, they will be re-checked quarterly; renames, acquisitions and product withdrawals take priority. Changes are logged on the directory and, when available, the relevant profile. Corrections and suggestions go to the contact page.

Every figure is dated

Guides carry a "Last updated" date, and each data product carries the date it was last reviewed in full, so you always know how current a number is, down to the day it was checked.

Question a source or a figure? Write to hello@insureaiwire.com with the article and the document you are reading, and we will check it against the source. The standards this page works to are set out in our editorial policy.

Last reviewed: SEP 8, 2026