Reference · 87 terms

Glossary

Plain-language definitions of the NAIC and insurance AI governance terms we use across the site.

Showing all 87 terms.

A

Accelerated Underwriting
A life insurance underwriting process that uses external data and predictive models to classify applicants without medical exams or fluid tests.
Full entry →
Actuarial Justification
The showing that an insurance rating or underwriting practice is supported by sound actuarial analysis and genuinely predictive of risk.
Full entry →
Adverse Action Notice
A notice the law requires when a consumer is denied credit, insurance, or employment based on a consumer report. FCRA sets its form and timing.
Full entry →
Adverse Consumer Outcome
A negative result for a consumer from an AI-supported insurance decision, such as a denial, higher premium, delayed claim, or reduced benefit.
Full entry →
Agentic AI
AI that pursues goals autonomously over multiple steps, such as retrying, routing, or coordinating with other systems, raising new accountability concerns.
Full entry →
AI Disclosure
The duty to tell consumers that an AI system played a material part in a decision that affects them.
Full entry →
AI Lifecycle
The full span of an AI system from design, development, and deployment through monitoring, retraining, and retirement.
Full entry →
AI Systems (AIS) Program
A written insurance AI governance program that assigns ownership, sets risk appetite, documents testing, and evolves with the company's AI use.
Full entry →
Algorithmic Bias
Systematic errors in a model that skew outputs in ways that are wrong or unfair, often rooted in training data, feature selection, or model design.
Full entry →
Algorithmic Discrimination
Unfairly different treatment of individuals or groups by an automated decision system, often through proxy variables or biased training data.
Full entry →
Alternative Data
Data not traditionally used in underwriting, such as credit history, driving behavior, or digital signals. Often regulated as ECDIS when applied to consumers.
Full entry →
Audit Rights
Contractual rights that let an insurer examine a vendor's AI systems, data practices, and compliance controls. Required for high-risk third-party AI.
Full entry →
Automated Decision System
A system that uses AI or algorithms to make or materially influence decisions about consumers, such as coverage, pricing, or claims outcomes.
Full entry →

B

Bias Testing
The process of testing an AI model for accuracy and outcome differences across groups, including protected classes and proxy variables.
Full entry →

C

Catastrophe Model
Software that runs a large simulated catalog of catastrophe events to estimate portfolio losses. It gives probabilities, not a forecast of next year.
Full entry →
Claims Adjudication
Reviewing, validating, and paying or denying insurance claims. AI used here is now a high-priority target for market conduct exams and litigation.
Full entry →
Colorado AI Act
Colorado SB 24-205, a comprehensive algorithmic-discrimination law. In force since June 30, 2026; SB 26-189 supersedes it on January 1, 2027.
Full entry →
Colorado Quantitative Testing Rule
A Colorado Division of Insurance draft regulation that would set quantitative testing standards for life underwriting models under SB 21-169. Not adopted.
Full entry →
Colorado SB 21-169
A 2021 Colorado law barring insurers from using external data or models that unfairly discriminate, implemented by the Division of Insurance line by line.
Full entry →
Colorado SB 26-189
A 2026 Colorado law that replaced SB 24-205 with a narrower disclosure-and-recourse framework for automated decision-making in insurance.
Full entry →
Consumer Recourse
The rights consumers have to appeal, correct, or contest an AI-influenced insurance decision, a central feature of Colorado SB 26-189 and similar state laws.
Full entry →

D

Data Governance
The framework for managing data quality, access, lineage, and compliance across the enterprise, including data used by AI systems.
Full entry →
Data Lineage
The documented path data takes from source through transformation, model training, and final use. Essential for AI explainability and regulatory review.
Full entry →
Data Minimization
The principle of collecting only the personal data needed for a specific purpose and deleting it when no longer necessary.
Full entry →
Department of Insurance
The state agency that licenses insurers, reviews rates, and enforces insurance law. Every state has one, though several run it under another name.
Full entry →
Disparate Impact
The disproportionately harmful effect a facially neutral practice has on a protected class. Insurance regulators address the same problem under other names.
Full entry →
Disparate Treatment
Intentional discrimination in which similarly situated consumers are treated differently because of a protected characteristic.
Full entry →
Due Diligence
The investigation an insurer performs before acquiring or deploying a third-party AI system, including assessment of the vendor, model, data, and risks.
Full entry →

E

Executive Order 14365
A December 2025 Trump administration order that points federal agencies at state AI laws conflicting with the national AI policy it declares.
Full entry →
Exhibit A
The first exhibit of the NAIC AI Systems Evaluation Tool: a count of how many AI systems an insurer runs in each operational area, and what they are used for.
Full entry →
Exhibit B
The NAIC AI Evaluation Tool's governance exhibit, answered as a narrative or a checklist, asking where an insurer's framework already covers each listed item.
Full entry →
Exhibit C
The high-risk model section of the NAIC AI Systems Evaluation Tool: what each high-risk model is, how it was validated, and when it was last tested.
Full entry →
Exhibit D
The data section of the NAIC AI Systems Evaluation Tool: a checklist of data-element categories, asking which ones feed your models and where each came from.
Full entry →
Explainability
The degree to which a model's decision can be understood and explained in human terms, a core requirement for AI governance and consumer recourse.
Full entry →
External Consumer Data and Information Sources
Data about consumers from outside an insurer's own records, such as credit reports, public records, and behavioral data. Heavily regulated in insurance.
Full entry →

F

Fair Credit Reporting Act
A federal law governing consumer reports and adverse-action notices, including how insurers use credit data, tenant-screening reports, and similar information.
Full entry →
Federal Preemption
When federal law displaces state law. Insurance runs the other way: McCarran-Ferguson protects state regulation unless Congress legislates about insurance.
Full entry →
First Notice of Loss
The moment a claim is first reported. NAIC model regulation calls it notification of claim and starts an acknowledgment clock from it, whatever took the report.
Full entry →
Foundation Model
A general-purpose AI model trained on broad data and adapted to many downstream tasks, including many LLMs and image models used in insurance applications.
Full entry →

G

Generative AI
AI that creates new content such as text, images, or code. In insurance it aids drafting, summarization, and service, but raises accuracy and privacy concerns.
Full entry →
Governance Committee
A cross-functional group that oversees AI risk, approves deployments, and reviews testing. Must meet regularly and have authority to pause AI systems.
Full entry →
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
A federal law requiring financial institutions, including insurers, to protect customer data privacy and notify consumers about information-sharing practices.
Full entry →

H

Human-in-the-Loop
A design where a human reviews or approves an AI system's output before it is acted on. Regulators expect it for adverse decisions; a few statutes require it.
Full entry →

I

Insurance Practices
The activities insurers engage in that are subject to state insurance law, including underwriting, pricing, claims, marketing, and fraud investigation.
Full entry →
Internal Controls
Policies and procedures that ensure AI systems operate as intended, including access controls, change management, and testing approvals.
Full entry →

L

Large Language Model
A type of generative AI trained on vast amounts of text to understand and produce human-like language. Powers chatbots, drafting tools, and search systems.
Full entry →
Less-Discriminatory Alternative
A model, variable, or practice that meets the same business purpose with less adverse effect on a protected class. Step 3 of the NYDFS comprehensive assessment.
Full entry →

M

Market Conduct Exam
A state insurance regulatory examination of an insurer's business practices, including sales, claims handling, underwriting, and now AI governance and fairness.
Full entry →
Market Regulation Handbook
The NAIC publication examiners work from. It standardizes how a market conduct exam is scoped, sampled, and documented, which is where AI files get requested.
Full entry →
McCarran-Ferguson Act
A 1945 statute leaving regulation of the business of insurance to the states. A later federal law overrides it only by specifically relating to that business.
Full entry →
Medical Necessity
Whether a service is clinically warranted enough to be covered. In California and in Medicare Advantage, a licensed clinician has to make that call, not a tool.
Full entry →
Medicare Advantage
Medicare Part C: private plans delivering Medicare benefits under CMS contract. AI-assisted denials there answer to federal rules, not only state law.
Full entry →
Model Card
A short document reporting what a model is for, how it was evaluated, and where it performs worse. An industry convention, not an NAIC requirement.
Full entry →
Model Drift
The degradation of a model's performance over time as real-world data or behavior changes away from the data it was trained on.
Full entry →
Model Inventory
A documented list of all models and AI systems in use, including their purpose, owners, risk tier, and validation status.
Full entry →
Model Law
A template statute the NAIC drafts for states to adopt as binding law. Unlike a Model Bulletin, it has the force of law once a state legislature adopts it.
Full entry →
Model Risk Management
The discipline of identifying, measuring, and controlling risks from models, including AI models used in insurance decisions.
Full entry →
Model Validation
The process of testing a model for accuracy, fairness, stability, and fitness for its intended use before and after deployment.
Full entry →

N

NAIC
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the U.S. standard-setting and coordination body for state insurance regulators.
Full entry →
NAIC AI Evaluation Tool
Optional supplemental exhibits the NAIC built for state regulators, structuring what they ask an insurer about its AI systems. At v4.0, in a 12-state pilot.
Full entry →
NAIC Big Data and AI (H) Working Group
The NAIC group that handles insurance AI. Its page is where the evaluation tool drafts, the bulletin adoption map, and the meeting materials are posted.
Full entry →
NAIC Model Bulletin
The NAIC's non-binding guidance for state insurance regulators on how insurers should govern, document, and test their use of AI systems.
Full entry →
NYDFS
The New York State Department of Financial Services, the state's combined insurance and banking regulator since 2011, which writes its own AI guidance.
Full entry →
NYDFS Circular Letter No. 7
July 2024 NY DFS guidance setting the Department's expectations for insurers using AI and external consumer data in underwriting and pricing.
Full entry →

O

Ongoing Monitoring
Regular observation of a model or AI system after deployment to catch drift, bias, accuracy degradation, and changing business conditions.
Full entry →

P

Predictive Model
A model that estimates a future outcome or likelihood from historical data, such as the probability of a claim or the risk of a policyholder.
Full entry →
Prior Authorization
A process where a health insurer must approve a treatment, service, or drug before covering it. AI has made this a focus of regulator and clinician scrutiny.
Full entry →
Producer
The licensed person or entity that sells, solicits, or negotiates insurance. Agents and brokers are producers, and licensing law follows their AI tools.
Full entry →
Protected Class
A group sharing a legally protected trait such as race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, or disability. AI testing screens for proxy effects.
Full entry →
Proxy Discrimination
Discrimination that happens when a neutral variable, such as zip code or credit data, correlates with a protected class and produces unfair outcomes.
Full entry →
Proxy Test
The assessment NYDFS expects on external consumer data: does it correlate with protected-class status, and if so, does a business necessity require it?
Full entry →

R

Rate Filing
The process of submitting proposed insurance rates or rating rules to a state regulator for review or approval before they can be used.
Full entry →
Rating Variable
A factor used in pricing or underwriting to predict risk, such as age, location, or driving history. Regulators scrutinize these for proxy discrimination.
Full entry →
Redlining
Discriminatory exclusion or higher pricing based on where a consumer lives, often via geographic variables in underwriting and pricing models.
Full entry →
Risk Adjustment
Paying a health plan more for sicker enrollees. In Medicare Advantage the CMS-HCC risk score is built from submitted diagnoses, so coding accuracy is money.
Full entry →
Risk Appetite
The amount and type of AI risk an insurer is willing to accept, expressed as thresholds for deployment, testing, and oversight.
Full entry →
Risk Tiering
Classifying AI systems by the level of consumer harm they could cause, so governance and testing can match the risk.
Full entry →

S

Shadow AI
AI tools or systems in use inside an organization that have not been logged, approved, or governed. They break AI inventories and create hidden regulatory risk.
Full entry →

T

Telematics
In-vehicle or phone technology that records how a car is driven. Usage-based auto insurance prices from it, which turns driving data into a rating input.
Full entry →
Third-Party AI
AI systems, models, or components built or operated by an outside vendor. The insurer stays responsible for outcomes even when the algorithm is rented.
Full entry →
Training Data
The data used to teach a machine-learning model to make predictions. Its quality and representativeness directly affect fairness and accuracy.
Full entry →

U

Underwriting and Pricing
Evaluating risk and setting premium rates. AI here is scrutinized for unfair discrimination and proxy effects across life, health, and property-casualty lines.
Full entry →
Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act
NAIC Model 900, the model law on claim investigation and settlement conduct. Most AI claims exposure lands here rather than in any AI-specific statute.
Full entry →
Unfair Discrimination
An insurance practice that treats similar consumers differently based on protected traits, often through proxies like zip code or credit data.
Full entry →
Unfair Trade Practices
State insurance laws barring deceptive, coercive, or harmful insurer practices, such as misrepresentation, twisting and rebating, and now some AI decisions.
Full entry →
Utilization Management
The review of health care service use to control cost and quality. AI is widely used here and is now a major focus of state and federal insurance oversight.
Full entry →

V

Vendor Oversight
An insurer remains answerable for AI a vendor built or runs, so the NAIC Model Bulletin folds third-party systems into the insurer's own AI Systems Program.
Full entry →